Start with the question, not the poster.
A film title is a useful display label, but it is a poor identifier. Different releases can share a name, and the same film may have several translated titles. In this proposed model, Film carries a stable identifier while each localized title remains a property.
Suppose our fictional catalogue contains Lantern Road and Northbound. We want to know which people worked on both. The question requires a relationship between films and people, not a search for matching words in their descriptions.
Let the credit carry the role.
One person may act, direct and write on the same film. A Credit connects Film to Person and carries role, character and credited order where those fields exist. This avoids duplicating the person whenever a role changes.
An example credit could link person P-014 to film F-021 as a director. A second credit may link the same person to film F-022 as a writer. The identifiers and titles in this article are invented to demonstrate the structure.
Show the path in the reply.
The proposed answer names the person, lists the two films and shows the credit supporting each connection. It should also distinguish a missing credit from evidence that someone did not participate. Absence from an incomplete catalogue cannot establish a negative claim.
The design lesson is simple: when a connection has its own properties, give that connection a place in the model. The real Movies dataset has not been inspected or connected for this design preview.